Latest News
Majority of gamblers hit with affordability checks have handed over info, but wider betting population unwilling
- Most bettors asked to undergo financial checks agree
- Higher spending players more willing than lower spenders
- Most who’ve not yet faced affordability checks say they will refuse
The majority of bettors who have been asked for proof they can afford to gamble have provided it, but there are big questions over how things will play out if checks become mandatory or more common, the results of a new study by sports betting community OLBG show.
A survey of bettors carried out online by YouGov for OLBG found that the majority of those who had been asked by gambling operators to provide documents such as payslips, bank statements or other documents had complied with the request.
The survey, which polled 1,007 bettors, found that 21.8% of bettors had already been asked for documents by at least one bookmaker. Of these, 74.3% had provided them, but 17.9% had refused and started playing with a different licensed operator instead. Of the remainder, 4.1% refused and moved to an unlicensed operator, while 3.7% stopped betting entirely.
The willingness to provide documentation was less widespread among those who had not yet been asked to do so, however.
Of the 78.2% of punters who had not yet faced affordability checks, 37.3% said they would refuse and simply stop betting, 35.0% said they would move to a different licensed operator and 4.1% said they’d go to an unlicensed company. Only 23.5% indicated they would be willing to provide the documents.
“Most bettors who have been asked to provide documents have done so. More importantly, very few of those who were asked stopped gambling or went to the black market, the latter being the worst unintended consequence of measures aimed at making gambling more responsible,” said Richard Moffat, CEO at OLBG.
“However, there is a stark difference between those who have been asked and those who haven’t in terms of willingness.”
As the below table shows, overall 65% of bettors reported not being willing to comply with affordability checks. Those betting lower monthly amounts were the least open to handing over financial documents, with more than three in four (75.4%) of those betting less than £5 a month and 72% of those betting £6-15 a month unwilling to undergo affordability checks.
“Few people who are spending at this level are likely to think it is proportionate for a bookie to ask for proof they can afford it and it’s quite surprising how many lower spending players report already having been asked. From the rumours about what level mandatory checks might come in, it seems unlikely checks will be forced on players at levels under £100 per month,” said Moffat.
Players spending less than £100 per month
Have you been asked by a gambling company to provide payslips, bank statements or similar documents as part of an affordability or proof of funds check? | All bettors | Less than £5 | £6-15 | £16-25 | £26-50 | £51-100 |
Unweighted base | 1,007 | 235 | 224 | 147 | 154 | 93 |
Yes, I have and I provided the required documents | 16.16% | 6.00% | 10.08% | 20.86% | 16.55% | 14.27% |
No, I have not but I would provide the documents if asked | 18.45% | 18.20% | 18.06% | 23.14% | 20.31% | 21.62% |
Yes, I have, but I didn’t provide the documents and bet with a different licensed company instead | 3.92% | 0.40% | 1.77% | 4.22% | 4.53% | 6.57% |
Yes, I have but I didn’t provide the documents and bet with a different unlicensed company instead | 0.90% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 0.71% | 1.29% | 1.08% |
Yes, I have but I didn’t provide the documents and stopped betting | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.43% | 0.70% | 1.94% | 1.10% |
No, I have not and if asked I wouldn’t provide the documents and would bet with a different licensed company instead | 27.40% | 20.40% | 31.52% | 24.80% | 35.25% | 38.36% |
No, I have not and if asked I wouldn’t provide the documents and would bet with an unlicensed company instead | 3.20% | 1.30% | 3.57% | 4.17% | 3.27% | 1.11% |
No, I have not and if asked I wouldn’t bet | 29.18% | 53.60% | 34.10% | 21.40% | 16.86% | 15.88% |
Total willing to provide documents | 34.61% | 24.20% | 28.14% | 44.00% | 36.86% | 35.89% |
Total unwilling to provide documents | 65.39% | 75.70% | 71.86% | 56.00% | 63.14% | 64.10% |
Players spending more than £100 per month
Have you been asked by a gambling company to provide payslips, bank statements or similar documents as part of an affordability or proof of funds check? | All bettors | £101-200 | £201-300 | £301-500 | £501-1000 |
Unweighted Base | 1,007 | 57 | 16 | 16 | 20 |
Yes, I have and I provided the required documents | 16.16% | 30.04% | 31.87% | 50.63% | 40.65% |
No, I have not but I would provide the documents if asked | 18.45% | 19.41% | 12.94% | 0.00% | 4.79% |
Yes, I have, but I didn’t provide the documents and bet with a different licensed company instead | 3.92% | 12.40% | 6.73% | 0.00% | 15.35% |
Yes, I have but I didn’t provide the documents and bet with a different unlicensed company instead | 0.90% | 1.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Yes, I have but I didn’t provide the documents and stopped betting | 0.79% | 1.70% | 0.00% | 6.45% | 0.00% |
No, I have not and if asked I wouldn’t provide the documents and would bet with a different licensed company instead | 27.40% | 24.19% | 36.36% | 30.49% | 28.90% |
No, I have not and if asked I wouldn’t provide the documents and would bet with an unlicensed company instead | 3.20% | 5.19% | 12.10% | 6.45% | 5.12% |
No, I have not and if asked I wouldn’t bet | 29.18% | 5.31% | 0.00% | 5.98% | 5.20% |
Total willing to provide documents | 34.61% | 49.45% | 44.81% | 50.63% | 45.44% |
Total unwilling to provide documents | 65.39% | 50.56% | 55.19% | 49.37% | 54.57% |
* Players spending more than £1,000 per month were excluded as numbers were too small to be statistically significant.
However, while willingness to undergo affordability checks does seem to increase among players who spend more on a monthly basis, even among those spending £100-plus per month, less than half were open to affordability checks.
One big difference between players at lower spend levels and those spending more than £100 was the likelihood of players stopping gambling if asked to undergo checks. While 53.6% of those betting less than £5 said they wouldn’t gamble if faced with affordability checks, just 5.31% said the same in the £101-200 per month category.
Higher spending players were more likely to have moved to a different licensed company rather than provide documents, but across all spending amounts a significant proportion of players reported plans to do so if asked to provide documents.
“Many players reported either having already moved to a different licensed operator or being willing to do so over affordability checks. Therefore, there is now a big question mark over what might happen if affordability checks become mandatory and all licensed operators have to impose them at certain levels,” said Moffat.
The survey also found that younger players were more willing to submit to financial checks. About one-third (33.34%) of those aged 18-24 said they had been asked for and provided documents, while 22.86% said they hadn’t been asked but would do so. In the 55-plus age group, the percentage of players reporting the same fell to 6.40% and 15.37%, respectively.
More details on this breakdown can be found in the full survey report, along with various other findings on the UK’s gambling habits.
Gambling in the USA
Gaming Americas Weekly Roundup – May 12-18

Welcome to our weekly roundup of American gambling news again! Here, we are going through the weekly highlights of the American gambling industry which include the latest news and new partnerships. Read on and get updated.
Latest News
Scientific Games was recognised with three prestigious honours in the 23rd Annual American Business Awards. The global lottery company won two Gold ABA awards for its retail technology, SciQ and PlayCentral Powered by SciQ, in the Operations Management Solutions and Emerging Technology categories, respectively. Scientific Games’ recently retired VP, Instant Game Production, Joe Bennett, earned a Silver ABA Award for Achievement in Management—Manufacturing, recognising his career contributions in secure lottery instant game production. This year, more than 3700 nominations from organisations of all sizes and industries were submitted to the ABAs. Winners were scored by more than 300 professionals worldwide during a rigorous judging process evaluating innovation, integrity, effectiveness, creativity and growth.
MGM Resorts has announced that it has reached a new employment agreement with CEO & President Bill Hornbuckle through December 31, 2028. As part of his new employment contract, the Company has also agreed to offer Hornbuckle an advisory agreement at the end of the term to assist with its integrated resort project in Osaka, Japan until its opening. As CEO, Hornbuckle oversees all aspects of MGM Resorts’ strategy, operations and hospitality and gaming development projects. He leads the company’s global development efforts and its digital gaming strategy.
Minimum Deposit Casinos (MDC) has released new insights into the tightening regulatory landscape for sweepstakes-based gaming in the US. Recent moves by lawmakers in New York, Louisiana, and Montana suggest a coordinated push to eliminate or restrict these alternative online gambling models. In New York, Senate Bill 5935, introduced by Sen. Joseph Addabbo, has advanced through the legislative process and targets the operation and supply of sweepstakes-style platforms. The bill specifically addresses platforms that use two forms of digital currency — one of which can be redeemed for real-world prizes — a setup now under scrutiny by state regulators.
New Partnerships
Rush Street Interactive (RSI), in partnership with Integrity Compliance 360 (IC360), has launched a new initiative called Gaming Literacy Aiding Decisions (GLAD), an innovative programme designed to assist educators in enhancing high school student gaming literacy and promoting that cohort’s responsible relationship with this ever more socially prevalent activity. The GLAD curriculum will initially launch in New Jersey and Delaware where, this spring, RSI and IC360 have been working with educational districts on a speaker series and educator curriculum delivery. These initial efforts will help define success metrics and gather feedback to shape the programme’s future, which will ultimately be available to educators more broadly to curate the content that resonates best with students.
The Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation (OLG) has selected Caesars Entertainment as the Service Provider in the Windsor Casino procurement process. This is the final procurement process in the OLG’s land-based gaming modernisation initiative. Caesars Entertainment and its predecessor companies have partnered with the OLG to operate Caesars Windsor (fka. Casino Windsor) since the opening of the temporary facility in 1994. Caesars Entertainment will assume responsibility for gaming and non-gaming operations of the Windsor casino on behalf of the OLG under a 20-year operating agreement, which is expected to begin in 2026.
The post Gaming Americas Weekly Roundup – May 12-18 appeared first on European Gaming Industry News.
Baltics
Modern Oracles & Smart Payments: Finrax’s Vision for Blockchain, AI & Beyond

Finrax steps into the spotlight as the official Lanyards Sponsor at HIPTHER’s MARE BALTICUM Gaming & TECH Summit 2025 in Vilnius, bringing with them a next-gen crypto payment gateway and a bold vision that extends far beyond payments.
We sat down with Konstantinas Balakinas, CEO of Finrax, to discuss the future of AI in finance, the real-world potential of blockchain beyond the buzzwords, and how Finrax plans to bridge fintech innovation with eCommerce and beyond.
Konstantinas, thank you for joining us! Can you please introduce yourself to our readers, and share more about your professional background and role in Finrax?
Thank you — it’s a pleasure to be part of this conversation, especially as Finrax steps into a more visible role at this year’s summit.
I’ve been working in the financial industry since 1999, mostly in regulated environments. The bulk of my career has been in consumer finance, where I had the chance to grow several companies from the ground up and eventually guide one through the process of securing a specialized bank license. That experience taught me a lot about how to build resilient financial infrastructure — and how to adapt when the rules, tools, and expectations shift.
My interest in AI came later. I had a first-hand look at its practical impact while working with a Lithuanian EMI that was really leaning into AI-driven operations. That sparked something — and eventually led me to study AI for Business Analytics at Turing College, where I’m currently sharpening both technical and strategic understanding of how AI can reshape financial services.
At Finrax, I serve as CEO and Chair of the Management Board in its Lithuanian entity. Our mission goes beyond crypto payments — we’re focused on building real utility for digital assets in a way that businesses can trust and adopt without friction.
How do you see today’s AI solutions? Can they be truly predictive, like “modern oracles”, or are we still in the realm of reactive technology?
AI today is generative AI — especially large language models (LLMs), which have made impressive progress in producing human-like text and anticipating user intent. So in a technical sense, yes — these systems are predictive, but not in the way many assume. What they predict is not the future itself, but the next statistically likely word or phrase based on patterns learned from massive datasets. That creates the appearance of intelligence, but not true comprehension.
This distinction is essential. As Carl Bergstrom and Jevin West explain in The Bullshit Machines, LLMs can sound coherent and authoritative while having no actual grasp of truth. They generate content that feels convincing, regardless of whether it’s accurate or logically sound. That’s not a flaw — it’s how they’re designed.
One should approach these tools with both optimism and caution. Today’s AI still sits within the boundaries of Artificial Narrow Intelligence — excellent at specific tasks like pattern recognition, anomaly detection, and content generation, but still a long way from Artificial General Intelligence, which would reason and adapt like a human across any domain. And Artificial Superintelligence, capable of recursive self-improvement and independent thought, remains firmly theoretical.
So, while we admire the capabilities of today’s generative AI, we don’t mistake fluency for understanding. These are powerful tools — but not oracles. The real challenge is using them responsibly and building systems around them that make sense in the real world.
What are some practical ways AI is and could be integrated into Finrax’s crypto payment platform? Are there use cases you’re already exploring or see as promising?
I see three core domains where AI tools offer real practical value — not just for Finrax, but for any fintech building towards efficiency, scale, and regulatory clarity.
The first is internal productivity. AI works well as a personal assistant for employees — helping with everything from drafting emails to summarizing documents or generating code. Off-the-shelf tools like ChatGPT are already useful for this, but their impact depends heavily on how well people know how to prompt them. That’s why custom GPTs are especially promising: they allow us to build tailored assistants with topic-specific knowledge and clear task guidance. For instance, an onboarding specialist might use one to walk through a compliant KYC checklist, while a developer could use another to generate smart contract boilerplate or debug Python scripts.
The second domain is AI agents — and this space is moving fast. These systems handle automated, rule-based workflows, often collaborating with other agents to move tasks along. They’re more constrained than LLMs, but more reliable when used within predefined rules. For a crypto payment platform like ours, agents could eventually assist in payment routing, compliance alerts, or even technical monitoring — anything repetitive that benefits from low-latency automation.
The third area is pattern recognition, where AI’s value is most proven. We see strong potential in using it to support fraud detection and ML/TF screening — not to replace human oversight, but to enhance it. Spotting unusual activity, flagging anomalies, or refining transaction scoring — these are all areas where AI can quietly but meaningfully improve risk management.
That said, we’re also realistic about the limits. With the EU AI Act now on the horizon, every integration has to pass the test of explainability, compliance, and accountability. Any system we deploy will need a clear inventory, GDPR alignment, risk assessment, and, in some cases, staff training. We’re already looking into how these rules will apply — especially as we explore the potential of agent-based systems.
So yes, we’re enthusiastic — but we’re moving deliberately. We’re not building AI from scratch, but we are actively exploring how to apply it in meaningful ways — both internally and within our services. Our business development team is already using tools like ChatGPT in their day-to-day work, and we see real gains in productivity and clarity. That’s the direction we’re leaning into: using AI where it helps people do their jobs better, not just to check a box.
Finrax has built a strong reputation for reliability and speed – processing crypto payments in under a minute. What differentiates your platform from other solutions currently available on the market?
Reliability is the real star here. Speed is expected in blockchain-based systems — but combining that speed with stability, predictability, and regulatory clarity is a much harder problem to solve. That’s exactly where Finrax delivers.
We’ve built a platform that doesn’t just move fast — it does so in a way businesses can actually depend on. We offer fixed-rate settlements to remove volatility, giving partners certainty about what they’ll receive. That’s especially important in high-volume environments, where financial precision matters just as much as transaction speed.
Compliance is also baked in. Every transaction goes through full AML/CTF screening, and our onboarding and monitoring standards are designed to meet the expectations of regulated businesses. That’s not a side feature — it’s part of our foundation.
And while many of our clients have international operations, we’re careful to operate only where we’re permitted to do so. With MiCA coming into force, we’re preparing to scale responsibly, aligned with the new rulebook.
So yes, we’re fast — but more importantly, we’re reliable. And in this space, that’s what truly sets us apart.
What opportunities do you see in the field of eCommerce for a crypto-first payment provider, and what role could Finrax play in shaping the future of online payments?
Crypto is here to stay — and with that in mind, we’re building the tools to help eCommerce businesses accept crypto as naturally as they would any traditional payment method. Our goal at Finrax is to provide plug-and-play solutions that allow online stores across the EU to accept payments in stablecoins or major cryptocurrencies without having to rethink their entire checkout process.
The opportunity goes beyond retail. We see strong potential in industries like logistics, aviation, luxury, and of course, gaming platforms — areas where cross-border payments, speed, and transparency really matter. That said, everything still depends on how quickly users adopt crypto in their day-to-day transactions.
What gives us optimism is the direction regulation is moving. With MiCA coming into effect in the EU, we’re finally getting a clear rulebook — and that’s exactly what’s needed to build trust. Once customers know that only licensed, properly regulated providers can offer these services, it changes the perception. It brings structure to the market — and with structure comes wider adoption.
At Finrax, we’re preparing for that shift. We don’t just want to be ready for the future of payments — we want to help shape it in a way that’s both efficient and trusted.
As the world becomes increasingly automated, how do you see Finrax maintaining a balance between innovation and user-centric service, especially amidst the fast-evolving tech and regulatory landscapes?
Automation, at its core, is about efficiency — but that doesn’t mean we lose sight of the human side. In fact, I’d argue that smart automation should strengthen customer-centricity, not weaken it.
At Finrax, we see automation as a way to free up our people to focus on what actually matters — understanding the client’s real needs, solving problems, and making sure the experience feels consistent and supportive across the board. It also helps us align internal processes more clearly, so that we’re not sending mixed messages to clients. That’s often where customer frustration begins — not with the technology, but with the gaps between systems and people.
Another benefit is the ability to understand customers more precisely. With better data and well-designed workflows, we can respond faster and more accurately, without adding friction.
But none of this can come at the expense of trust. As regulations like MiCA, GDPR, and the EU AI Act begin shaping the environment, it’s clear that automation must be explainable, compliant, and ethically sound. For us, innovation isn’t just about what’s possible — it’s about what’s responsible. And we see that as a competitive advantage, not a constraint.
You’ll be joining the panel “Beyond the Hype” at MARE BALTICUM, discussing blockchain and AI applications in finance and governance. What are you most looking forward to sharing with the audience – and what do you hope to take away from the conversation?
A lot of the hype around AI comes from not really understanding how it works — and I think it’s important to go back to the basics. Most people still assume these systems “know” things. But in reality, large language models are built by training on massive volumes of data — much of it containing human bias, errors, or even outright misinformation. They don’t reason. They predict. They break down language into tokens and map those tokens across hundreds of abstract dimensions — far beyond how we perceive space — then generate output that mimics meaning, even if it’s not grounded in real understanding. But it’s not grounded in fact unless you make it so.
Even the best models will produce an answer to almost anything — even if that answer is fabricated. That’s why we see hallucinations. Unless you know how to prompt properly and critically assess the output, the result might sound confident while being completely off. This is why I always say: at this stage, AI should be seen as an assistant, not an authority. The human must remain in the loop — and at the top.
That said, the future isn’t bleak — it’s exciting, if we use these tools responsibly. One example that stands out to me is what Stripe recently did. They trained an AI model not on words or code, but on tens of billions of payment transactions. The model learned the “language” of money — identifying how payments behave, how fraud patterns look, and what hidden connections exist between different data points. The result? They went from detecting 59% of sophisticated card testing fraud attempts to 97% — almost overnight. That’s not just a technical win — it’s a complete shift in how we think about structured financial data.
So on this panel, I’m hoping to bring two things to the table: first, a grounded reminder that no model is infallible, and second, a practical optimism. AI has the potential to make finance faster, smarter, and safer — but only if we stay thoughtful about how we design, train, and regulate it. Humans should come first — but we don’t need to fear the future if we build it wisely.
Meet Konstantinas Balakinas and the Finrax team live at the MARE BALTICUM Gaming & TECH Summit 2025 on 27–28 May in Vilnius.
🔗 Register now to learn more about blockchain-powered finance, crypto innovation, and the real tech shaping tomorrow’s payments.
The post Modern Oracles & Smart Payments: Finrax’s Vision for Blockchain, AI & Beyond appeared first on European Gaming Industry News.
Latest News
GR8 Tech Strengthens Technology Leadership with New CTO Appointment

GR8 Tech welcomes Edward Smyshliaiev as the new Chief Technology Officer (CTO). The organizational change strengthens the company’s high-performance tech leadership and platform innovation.
With over two decades of experience in software engineering, AI, machine learning, and large-scale digital transformation, Edward has a proven track record of turning complex challenges into scalable solutions.
“Joining GR8 Tech at the present moment fills me with immense enthusiasm. I am really impressed by the company’s innovative mindset and its ability to see clearly into the future. I’m excited to work with the exceptional and gr8 team to redefine the limits of what is feasible and determined to provide unparalleled technological solutions that will empower our clients and disrupt the industry,” said Edward Smyshliaiev.
As CTO, Edward will focus on building strong teams, streamlining development, and enhancing GR8 Tech’s architecture to support global growth. He’ll gradually take over key areas such as platform, information security, and technical governance, ensuring the platform delivers high value to partners.
Artur Ashyrov, who previously shared the roles of Deputy CEO and CTO, will now focus on operational leadership while continuing to drive technology forward through GR8 Tech’s internal Innovation Sprint—a company-wide initiative to boost tech-savviness and ignite a culture of innovation across teams.
“As I step into a broader strategic focus, I’m excited to support Edward in driving GR8 Tech’s product innovation from a leadership position rooted in tech. It’s a natural evolution for a company building the future of B2B platforms,” said Ashyrov.
The post GR8 Tech Strengthens Technology Leadership with New CTO Appointment appeared first on European Gaming Industry News.
-
gaming3 years ago
ODIN by 4Players: Immersive, state-of-the-art in-game audio launches into the next generation of gaming
-
EEG iGaming Directory8 years ago
iSoftBet continues to grow with new release Forest Mania
-
News7 years ago
Softbroke collaborates with Asia Live Tech for the expansion of the service line in the igaming market
-
News6 years ago
Super Bowl LIII: NFL Fans Can Bet on the #1 Sportsbook Review Site Betting-Super-Bowl.com, Providing Free Unbiased and Trusted News, Picks and Predictions
-
iGaming Industry7 years ago
Rick Meitzler appointed to the Indian Gaming Magazine Advisory Board for 2018
-
News6 years ago
REVEALED: Top eSports players set to earn $3.2 million in 2019
-
iGaming Industry8 years ago
French Senator raises Loot Boxes to France’s Gambling Regulator
-
News7 years ago
Exclusive Interview with Miklos Handa (Founder of the email marketing solutions, “MailMike.net”), speaker at Vienna International Gaming Expo 2018