Reading Time: 3 minutes
At least $1 billion a year is believed to be pouring into offshore accounts of Russian shell companies linked to just one semi-legal but blossoming industry: online gambling.
This poses a new challenge for Russia as it prepares to host the World Cup in June and July — the country has already been plagued for decades by allegations of match-fixing in its domestic soccer.
No one expects illicit betting to play a role on the pitch when soccer’s most celebrated competition kicks off in 100 days.
But it represents another dark corner of Russia’s economy that the authorities have struggled to police.
“The total turnover volume of the legal and offshore online bookmaking market is more than $2 billion (€1.6 billion) a year,” Anton Rozhkovsky, the director of the government-mandated TsUPIS online betting payment system, said.
“We do not pretend to know if the actual figure is $2.5 billion or $4 billion,” he said. “Around 70 percent of that is illegal, offshore business.”
Pent-up demand for organized gambling was unleashed with the collapse of the Soviet Union and led to glitzy casinos and seedy slot machine halls opening across Russia.
They skirted paying taxes but were not strictly illegal.
The government tried to impose order by shutting them all down in 2009 and allowing bookies to open sport betting shops that instantly gravitated toward soccer.
Improved internet access pushed most of these punters online and produced a legal vacuum filled by scores of anonymous websites with no licenses but burgeoning business.
Russia’s Bookmakers Rating gambling analysis center pegged the entire industry’s annual turnover at $11.8 billion in May 2017, 65 percent of it made in illegal online bets.
It also expected the market to triple in the next five years thanks to high-profile events such as the World Cup.
“We expect colossal interest in the World Cup,” said Alena Sheyanova, spokeswoman for the legally registered bookmaker Leon. “The legal online betting industry is developing at phenomenal rates.”
TsUPIS took its first registered bet in February 2016 and is servicing 15 authorized bookmakers.
One of these is an established Austrian brand that jumped through the hoops to obtain a license last year.
But popular Irish and British bookies do not take Russian bets and the other 14 bookmakers are local startups.
“Most of the rest are small offshore companies registered in the Netherlands Antilles, Costa Rica or European jurisdictions such as Malta and Gibraltar,” said Rozhkovsky.
Bettors going the legal route are required to pay a tax and submit identity papers in person with both TsUPIS and each bookie they use.
The laborious process can take weeks and is simply evaded by illegal websites appearing under the .com rather than Russia’s national .ru domain.
People skirt sporadic bans on such sites by using a virtual private network (VPN) to access the unfiltered internet.
“Because of these technicalities, our business is not developing as quickly as it could,” Leon’s Sheyanova said.
Analysts further worry that “gray money” placed in offshore accounts may allow fixers to illegally profit off Russian soccer undetected.
Anzor Kavazashvili is a former Soviet goalkeeper who played in the 1966 and 1970 World Cups and more recently tried stamping out match fixing after being encouraged by former UEFA boss Michel Platini, who was deposed in 2015 for ethical breaches.
It was 2011 and “Platini told us we were the only country in Europe without an agency in charge of match fixing,” the 77-year-old said in an interview.
“We knew games could be fixed by players, trainers, player agents and referees. So we took on a comprehensive approach.”
Kavazashvili did not last long. A scandal over a refereeing decision led to his independent council being disbanded in 2012.
Suspicious results in games were a staple of Russian soccer from the 1990s into the early 2000s. The most glaring involved smaller teams owned by local governments or businesses and playing far from the glare of the national media.
Kavazashvili said sarcastically that “our respected bookies” often played a leading role.
Some betting houses were especially fond of spreading match fixing rumors to get officials to annul results of clean matches where they were due to pay out on big bets.
The situation in the Premier League seems to have improved with time because teams are increasingly being treated like businesses.
“Clean clubs have appeared whose owners see no profit in fixed results,” said Echo of Moscow radio sport commentator Anton Orekh.
But the lower leagues remain unmonitored and they, pointedly, receive an estimated one-fifth of all soccer bets.
Source: European Gaming Media and Events